| Copyrights © 2007 All Rights Reserved African Examiner Online is owned by RD Frontline LLC, a state of Maryland registered company P. O. Box 11582 Baltimore, MD, 21229, USA Tel: 443-904-1239. Editor-In-Chief: Oludare Sunday Fase |
News, Politics, Sports
about Nigeria and all Africa
about Nigeria and all Africa
Custom Search
| Get our News Update fast, download AE Toolbar! Click here to download Now! |
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
| Online media |
+THE GUARDIAN
+THE STAR
+THE PUNCH
+NIGERIAN TRIBUNE
+TIMES OF ZAMBIA
+THE SUN
+DAILY GRAPHICS
+THISDAY
+MAIL & GUARDIAN
+VANGUARD
+D/INDEPENDENT
+234next
+The nation
+Daily trust
+Ghana Times
+7amnewsextra
+THE STAR
+THE PUNCH
+NIGERIAN TRIBUNE
+TIMES OF ZAMBIA
+THE SUN
+DAILY GRAPHICS
+THISDAY
+MAIL & GUARDIAN
+VANGUARD
+D/INDEPENDENT
+234next
+The nation
+Daily trust
+Ghana Times
+7amnewsextra
| Newspapers |
It has long been certain that “the wheels of justice grind slowly”, (in Nigeria
and other less refined societies, usually oiled by Corruption) yet, contrary to
the old adage, they don’t necessarily “grind exceedingly fine.” In all cases,
it is the victims that suffer the consequences.
In many cases, hearings are listed intermittently, weeks, if not months,
apart. They are interrupted in the middle of cross-examinations, for
instance, which have to be resumed after a long hiatus. Not only does this
not serve the cause of justice, it subverts it. In our non-jury system we trust
judges to retain their impressions of witnesses for unreasonably protracted
periods.
Prosecutors, witnesses, and even judges however, can hardly be trusted
especially in this decadent society which is endemic with corruption. Then
there are lots of external, often sinister influences, not only from the
government itself, but also from various selfish political and individual
interests. This is the crux of the matter.
Yet this anomaly isn’t preordained or immutable. Perhaps the time has
come to copy the US system, where trials are conducted continuously – full
day after full day. This isn’t unfeasible here. We can take leave of inefficient,
though familiar, legal habits and overhaul the system – even if vested
interests are sure to be sacrificed along the way.
Our civic hygiene will not be cleansed and respect for the rule of law will not
be sustained until our judicial system are forced to respect others’ time and
abide by timetables just as ordinary citizens must.
Now, it is alright if the victim is actually guilty, or eventually found guilty;
after all, we will say Justice has been served, and we will say one is
innocent until proven guilty, but in our dear country, you are usually guilty
until proven innocent, and by that time, you have suffered a great deal and
have been subjected to indignities and trauma due to delay of justice and
trampling of your rights.
A particularly sad illustration of deliberate official and judicial foot-dragging,
manipulation of the judicial process and disregard for the rule of law and
human rights, was added recently in the case of the Economic and
Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) versus Chief Joe Musa, erstwhile
Director General of the National Gallery of Arts and three other Directors of
the department (Dr Kweku Tandoh, Mr Olusegun Ogunba and Mrs Elizabeth
Oparagu). Mr Joe Musa and these 3 others were arrested, detained and
prosecuted in a miasma of unfounded, disgraceful and spurious allegations
of theft and embezzlement by the EFCC in July 2009 and for the last two
and a half years their lives have been turned upside down, their families have
suffered trauma and humiliation and their careers put on hold. Mr Musa (D-
G) and one of the co-defendants, Dr Kweku Tandoh, an Executive Director,
were appointed in 2006 by Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, who was then the
Minister for Culture and Tourism in the Obasanjo Administration.
A case that never should have reached court in the first place dragged on
and on for almost three years due mostly, at best, to the incompetence of
the EFCC investigators and lawyers, and at worst, possibly due to corrupt
compromise, blatant and arrogant disregard for the judicial process and the
rights of man.
The legal axiom, "Justice delayed is justice denied" means that if legal
redress is available for a party that has suffered some injury, but is not
forthcoming in a timely fashion, it is effectively the same as having no
redress at all. This principle is the basis for the right to a speedy trial and
similar rights which are meant to expedite the legal system, because it is
unfair for the injured party to have to sustain the injury with little hope for
resolution. The phrase has become a rallying cry for legal reformers who
view courts or governments as acting too slowly in resolving legal issues
either because the existing system is too complex, corrupted or
overburdened, or because the issue or party in question lacks political
support.
On 6th December 2011, the Federal High Court in Abuja not only acquitted
and discharged these people of all the charges but the Judge, Justice O A
Adeniyi (Commendation is due to this learned man of courage and integrity),
in his 33–page ruling, also lambasted the EFCC for filing criminal charges
against them that were based on nothing but ''pepper soup and beer parlour
gossip'' and for wasting their time and the courts time for two and a half
years. The judge said that based on the evidence that was presented, the
EFCC should NEVER have filed charges against these four innocent civil
servants in the first place and that they should not have sought to torment
them in this way and almost destroy their lives. The Honourable Justice
even went as far as saying that he would have wanted to compel the EFCC
to pay heavy damages to these people for the injustice that have been done
against them by opting to charge them to court almost three years ago.
Following my own knowledge and investigations into the case, the following
is a timeline and chronology of their ordeal:
• It all started when Mr Joe Musa and 4 of his directors received a call
from the EFCC on Friday 17th July 2009 asking that all the directors and
the D-G should come to their (EFCC’s) office on Monday 20th July 2009 for
a meeting. When they got there on that day, they noticed after a while that
one of the Directors (Abdullahi Muku) had left the room where the other
Directors and the D-G were waiting. Shortly after, the EFCC officers came
to the waiting men with court papers and said they were taking them to
court right away to charge them to court. On arrival at the court, there were
TV cameras, print media men already waiting for their arrival.
• The judge granted the accused’s’ oral application for bail but with
conditions which could not be fulfilled on that day, so they spent some days
in prison detention before the bail conditions were met. The DG and one of
the directors spent two nights but the other two spent four nights. The
director who had been with them at the EFCC office and who had sneaked
out was not charged. (He is currently the D-G of the NGA) After the
arraignment in court on that date, the case officially started on October 19,
2009.
• Meanwhile, the Chairman of the Board of the National Gallery of Arts
(NGA) had suspended the four arraigned officials of the NGA without pay on
28th July 2009.
• Mr Musa and the three other accused then started going to court for a
total of 14 occasions between 19 October 2009 and 6 December 2011 and
out of that, nine (9) of the adjournments were at the instance of the EFCC
lawyer who always failed to produce his witnesses for frivolous reasons.
• Of all the directors of the NGA, only the director, who surreptitiously
left the EFCC Office, Alhaji Muku, was not charged to court in the case. As
at that time, he was the most junior of all the directors.
• All the eight prosecution witnesses who came to court to peddle
falsehoods and lies were disgruntled staff of the NGA who all had one
grouse or the other against the DG.
• For the two and a half years the case was in court and with the
support of Barrister Peter Eze (the former Board Chairman) , Muku got
himself confirmed as D-G; all the petitioners (who were also the prosecution
witnesses) have since received rapid promotions and other benefits and are
now occupying sensitive positions in the NGA.
• The writers of the initial petitions against Joe Musa and the other
directors were the same people who became prosecution witnesses for the
EFCC.
• The former Board Chairman, Peter Eze was so consumed in his
desire to suspend the directors in 2009 that he unilaterally took the decision
without the input of the other board members and in so doing, deliberately
ignored and failed to follow due process. Furthermore, he went to the Police
to report Joe Musa and the three directors and accused them of threatening
the peace of the NGA and should be arrested.
• For the two and a half years the case was on, Joe Musa and the
three directors were suspended without pay thereby putting them and their
families in very serious financial distress.
• When the case commenced in July 2009, the EFCC employed the
whole of the electronic and print media to state that they had all the
evidence they needed to prosecute the case etc. Yet, and isn’t it strange,
that the EFCC lawyer kept delaying the case for over a year until the judge
gave them an ultimatum?
• At the end of it all, there was no shred of evidence produced in court
as stated clearly in the judge's ruling – the case of the EFCC was all based
on “pepper soup and beer parlour gossip'' – according to the presiding judge’
s ruling.
Questions that need be answered:
1. Was the whole case a setup from the beginning by Alhaji Abdullahi
Muku, present D-G of NGA and some other staff to get rid of former D-G Joe
Musa and the other directors so that they could take over the management
of the NGA?
2. Why was Alhaji Abdullahi Muku who was also a director in the NGA
at the time, not charged along with all the other directors?
3. What was the role of the former board chairman, Barrister Peter Eze
in this sinister plot against Joe Musa and the others?
4. If as the court stated clearly in its ruling the prosecution witnesses
peddled lies and gossips in court, shouldn't they as civil servants and staff
of the NGA be disciplined for writing false petitions and peddling lies in court
against their superiors?
5. Why have the petition writers (who are staff of the NGA and also
were prosecution witnesses) received rapid promotions and other such
benefits at the NGA between the time the case started in 2009 and now?
6. Why was the EFCC lawyer Steve Odiase more interested in
delaying the case by asking for adjournments spanning over a one year
period? Was it to allow for Muku and the others to consolidate themselves
in office?
It is imperative that the Honourable Minister of Culture and Tourism, Chief
Edem Duke, sets up a panel of inquiry to look into these very serious
issues so that justice can be seen to have been done.
In this particular case, commendation must go to the Judge, Justice
Adeniyi, a courageous and fair man of law, who many times faced sly and
cunning tactics from the EFCC lawyer, and whose patience finally expired
after the incessant and obvious delay tactics being employed. He saw
through these tactics, and although legally bound to be exhaustive in his
hearing of the case, decided that the case does not, after almost three
years, have any merit and a halt needed to be called to this ugly, deceitful,
deceptive and fraudulent charade being paraded by the EFCC with the active
collaboration, if not persistence, of these insidious, deceitful and invidious
NGA petitioners in the name of legal process and rule of law..
What the case has highlighted (and there are many hundreds of such cases
in Nigeria) to me personally and what Nigerians should be worried about is
the arrogant and dastardly display of power by supposedly law enforcement
agents; manipulation of the system to suit insidious and self-serving
ambitious purposes; political intrigues even in the Civil Service; the
frequency, and apparently normalcy of trampling on the human and civil
rights of the citizenry by those in positions of authority in the name of
fighting crime, including corruption; and a blatant disregard for humaneness
and compassion for our brothers and sisters in our society.
With the conclusion of this farce and fiasco (unfortunately, it is not so funny
to the victims, Joe Musa and the three directors) it is our hope and call to
the Minister in charge to investigate the past and current leadership and
management of the National Gallery of Art as to why and how such
conniving, conspiratorial, despicable and utterly malevolent members of staff
of this high profile department of government could successfully manipulate
the country’s foremost anti-corruption agency and the Federal Government
of Nigeria, with the latter ending up with eggs all over their collective faces.
The innocent D-G and the three directors should be quickly paid their owed
salaries and allowances spanning two and a half years and reinstated fully
to their former positions in the civil service.
There is currently no board in place for the NGA as all boards were
dissolved by the President in September and that of the NGA is yet to be
reconstituted.
The Truth must be said always.
I wish you ALL a Happy New Year.
and other less refined societies, usually oiled by Corruption) yet, contrary to
the old adage, they don’t necessarily “grind exceedingly fine.” In all cases,
it is the victims that suffer the consequences.
In many cases, hearings are listed intermittently, weeks, if not months,
apart. They are interrupted in the middle of cross-examinations, for
instance, which have to be resumed after a long hiatus. Not only does this
not serve the cause of justice, it subverts it. In our non-jury system we trust
judges to retain their impressions of witnesses for unreasonably protracted
periods.
Prosecutors, witnesses, and even judges however, can hardly be trusted
especially in this decadent society which is endemic with corruption. Then
there are lots of external, often sinister influences, not only from the
government itself, but also from various selfish political and individual
interests. This is the crux of the matter.
Yet this anomaly isn’t preordained or immutable. Perhaps the time has
come to copy the US system, where trials are conducted continuously – full
day after full day. This isn’t unfeasible here. We can take leave of inefficient,
though familiar, legal habits and overhaul the system – even if vested
interests are sure to be sacrificed along the way.
Our civic hygiene will not be cleansed and respect for the rule of law will not
be sustained until our judicial system are forced to respect others’ time and
abide by timetables just as ordinary citizens must.
Now, it is alright if the victim is actually guilty, or eventually found guilty;
after all, we will say Justice has been served, and we will say one is
innocent until proven guilty, but in our dear country, you are usually guilty
until proven innocent, and by that time, you have suffered a great deal and
have been subjected to indignities and trauma due to delay of justice and
trampling of your rights.
A particularly sad illustration of deliberate official and judicial foot-dragging,
manipulation of the judicial process and disregard for the rule of law and
human rights, was added recently in the case of the Economic and
Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) versus Chief Joe Musa, erstwhile
Director General of the National Gallery of Arts and three other Directors of
the department (Dr Kweku Tandoh, Mr Olusegun Ogunba and Mrs Elizabeth
Oparagu). Mr Joe Musa and these 3 others were arrested, detained and
prosecuted in a miasma of unfounded, disgraceful and spurious allegations
of theft and embezzlement by the EFCC in July 2009 and for the last two
and a half years their lives have been turned upside down, their families have
suffered trauma and humiliation and their careers put on hold. Mr Musa (D-
G) and one of the co-defendants, Dr Kweku Tandoh, an Executive Director,
were appointed in 2006 by Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, who was then the
Minister for Culture and Tourism in the Obasanjo Administration.
A case that never should have reached court in the first place dragged on
and on for almost three years due mostly, at best, to the incompetence of
the EFCC investigators and lawyers, and at worst, possibly due to corrupt
compromise, blatant and arrogant disregard for the judicial process and the
rights of man.
The legal axiom, "Justice delayed is justice denied" means that if legal
redress is available for a party that has suffered some injury, but is not
forthcoming in a timely fashion, it is effectively the same as having no
redress at all. This principle is the basis for the right to a speedy trial and
similar rights which are meant to expedite the legal system, because it is
unfair for the injured party to have to sustain the injury with little hope for
resolution. The phrase has become a rallying cry for legal reformers who
view courts or governments as acting too slowly in resolving legal issues
either because the existing system is too complex, corrupted or
overburdened, or because the issue or party in question lacks political
support.
On 6th December 2011, the Federal High Court in Abuja not only acquitted
and discharged these people of all the charges but the Judge, Justice O A
Adeniyi (Commendation is due to this learned man of courage and integrity),
in his 33–page ruling, also lambasted the EFCC for filing criminal charges
against them that were based on nothing but ''pepper soup and beer parlour
gossip'' and for wasting their time and the courts time for two and a half
years. The judge said that based on the evidence that was presented, the
EFCC should NEVER have filed charges against these four innocent civil
servants in the first place and that they should not have sought to torment
them in this way and almost destroy their lives. The Honourable Justice
even went as far as saying that he would have wanted to compel the EFCC
to pay heavy damages to these people for the injustice that have been done
against them by opting to charge them to court almost three years ago.
Following my own knowledge and investigations into the case, the following
is a timeline and chronology of their ordeal:
• It all started when Mr Joe Musa and 4 of his directors received a call
from the EFCC on Friday 17th July 2009 asking that all the directors and
the D-G should come to their (EFCC’s) office on Monday 20th July 2009 for
a meeting. When they got there on that day, they noticed after a while that
one of the Directors (Abdullahi Muku) had left the room where the other
Directors and the D-G were waiting. Shortly after, the EFCC officers came
to the waiting men with court papers and said they were taking them to
court right away to charge them to court. On arrival at the court, there were
TV cameras, print media men already waiting for their arrival.
• The judge granted the accused’s’ oral application for bail but with
conditions which could not be fulfilled on that day, so they spent some days
in prison detention before the bail conditions were met. The DG and one of
the directors spent two nights but the other two spent four nights. The
director who had been with them at the EFCC office and who had sneaked
out was not charged. (He is currently the D-G of the NGA) After the
arraignment in court on that date, the case officially started on October 19,
2009.
• Meanwhile, the Chairman of the Board of the National Gallery of Arts
(NGA) had suspended the four arraigned officials of the NGA without pay on
28th July 2009.
• Mr Musa and the three other accused then started going to court for a
total of 14 occasions between 19 October 2009 and 6 December 2011 and
out of that, nine (9) of the adjournments were at the instance of the EFCC
lawyer who always failed to produce his witnesses for frivolous reasons.
• Of all the directors of the NGA, only the director, who surreptitiously
left the EFCC Office, Alhaji Muku, was not charged to court in the case. As
at that time, he was the most junior of all the directors.
• All the eight prosecution witnesses who came to court to peddle
falsehoods and lies were disgruntled staff of the NGA who all had one
grouse or the other against the DG.
• For the two and a half years the case was in court and with the
support of Barrister Peter Eze (the former Board Chairman) , Muku got
himself confirmed as D-G; all the petitioners (who were also the prosecution
witnesses) have since received rapid promotions and other benefits and are
now occupying sensitive positions in the NGA.
• The writers of the initial petitions against Joe Musa and the other
directors were the same people who became prosecution witnesses for the
EFCC.
• The former Board Chairman, Peter Eze was so consumed in his
desire to suspend the directors in 2009 that he unilaterally took the decision
without the input of the other board members and in so doing, deliberately
ignored and failed to follow due process. Furthermore, he went to the Police
to report Joe Musa and the three directors and accused them of threatening
the peace of the NGA and should be arrested.
• For the two and a half years the case was on, Joe Musa and the
three directors were suspended without pay thereby putting them and their
families in very serious financial distress.
• When the case commenced in July 2009, the EFCC employed the
whole of the electronic and print media to state that they had all the
evidence they needed to prosecute the case etc. Yet, and isn’t it strange,
that the EFCC lawyer kept delaying the case for over a year until the judge
gave them an ultimatum?
• At the end of it all, there was no shred of evidence produced in court
as stated clearly in the judge's ruling – the case of the EFCC was all based
on “pepper soup and beer parlour gossip'' – according to the presiding judge’
s ruling.
Questions that need be answered:
1. Was the whole case a setup from the beginning by Alhaji Abdullahi
Muku, present D-G of NGA and some other staff to get rid of former D-G Joe
Musa and the other directors so that they could take over the management
of the NGA?
2. Why was Alhaji Abdullahi Muku who was also a director in the NGA
at the time, not charged along with all the other directors?
3. What was the role of the former board chairman, Barrister Peter Eze
in this sinister plot against Joe Musa and the others?
4. If as the court stated clearly in its ruling the prosecution witnesses
peddled lies and gossips in court, shouldn't they as civil servants and staff
of the NGA be disciplined for writing false petitions and peddling lies in court
against their superiors?
5. Why have the petition writers (who are staff of the NGA and also
were prosecution witnesses) received rapid promotions and other such
benefits at the NGA between the time the case started in 2009 and now?
6. Why was the EFCC lawyer Steve Odiase more interested in
delaying the case by asking for adjournments spanning over a one year
period? Was it to allow for Muku and the others to consolidate themselves
in office?
It is imperative that the Honourable Minister of Culture and Tourism, Chief
Edem Duke, sets up a panel of inquiry to look into these very serious
issues so that justice can be seen to have been done.
In this particular case, commendation must go to the Judge, Justice
Adeniyi, a courageous and fair man of law, who many times faced sly and
cunning tactics from the EFCC lawyer, and whose patience finally expired
after the incessant and obvious delay tactics being employed. He saw
through these tactics, and although legally bound to be exhaustive in his
hearing of the case, decided that the case does not, after almost three
years, have any merit and a halt needed to be called to this ugly, deceitful,
deceptive and fraudulent charade being paraded by the EFCC with the active
collaboration, if not persistence, of these insidious, deceitful and invidious
NGA petitioners in the name of legal process and rule of law..
What the case has highlighted (and there are many hundreds of such cases
in Nigeria) to me personally and what Nigerians should be worried about is
the arrogant and dastardly display of power by supposedly law enforcement
agents; manipulation of the system to suit insidious and self-serving
ambitious purposes; political intrigues even in the Civil Service; the
frequency, and apparently normalcy of trampling on the human and civil
rights of the citizenry by those in positions of authority in the name of
fighting crime, including corruption; and a blatant disregard for humaneness
and compassion for our brothers and sisters in our society.
With the conclusion of this farce and fiasco (unfortunately, it is not so funny
to the victims, Joe Musa and the three directors) it is our hope and call to
the Minister in charge to investigate the past and current leadership and
management of the National Gallery of Art as to why and how such
conniving, conspiratorial, despicable and utterly malevolent members of staff
of this high profile department of government could successfully manipulate
the country’s foremost anti-corruption agency and the Federal Government
of Nigeria, with the latter ending up with eggs all over their collective faces.
The innocent D-G and the three directors should be quickly paid their owed
salaries and allowances spanning two and a half years and reinstated fully
to their former positions in the civil service.
There is currently no board in place for the NGA as all boards were
dissolved by the President in September and that of the NGA is yet to be
reconstituted.
The Truth must be said always.
I wish you ALL a Happy New Year.
That EFCC vs Joe Musa and others Court Saga:
Questions Need Asking
Questions Need Asking
| Home | Sports | Interview | Articles | Business | Letters | Social | Photo | Archives | Adverts | Entertainment | Contact us | About us | Terms | Blog |
| Home | Sports | Interview | Articles | Business | Letters | Social | Photo | Archives | Polls | Adverts | Entertainment | Contact us | About us | Terms |
________________________________________________________________________
HTML Comment Box is loading comments...
Leave a Comment
Disclaimer: Comments posted on this site do not reflect the views of African
Examiner.com. Please avoid abusive, vulgar, racist or rude words. Our
editors regulate these comments. Any comment that violates this term
of use will be deleted and may be banned. Send report of any misuse to
editor@africanexaminer.com. Thanks
Disclaimer: Comments posted on this site do not reflect the views of African
Examiner.com. Please avoid abusive, vulgar, racist or rude words. Our
editors regulate these comments. Any comment that violates this term
of use will be deleted and may be banned. Send report of any misuse to
editor@africanexaminer.com. Thanks
__________________________________
Jonathan tasks NDDC, Niger
Delta Ministry on projects
African Examiner
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Delta Ministry on projects
African Examiner
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Adamant FG implements
Subsidy removal
African Examiner
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Subsidy removal
African Examiner
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Probe: Senate indicts
El-Rufai, revokes sale of
Transcorp, NICON, Daily
Times
African Examiner
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
El-Rufai, revokes sale of
Transcorp, NICON, Daily
Times
African Examiner
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Jonathan woos PDP
leaders over subsidy
removal
African Examiner
Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2011
leaders over subsidy
removal
African Examiner
Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2011
IMF endorses reforms in
Nigeria
African Examiner
Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2011
Nigeria
African Examiner
Wednesday, Dec. 21, 2011
Akintokunbo A Adejumo
Sunday, December 25, 2011
Sunday, December 25, 2011
UK axes doctors from nine
Nigerian universities
African Examiner
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Nigerian universities
African Examiner
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Petrol to cost N139 per litre
next year– Iweala
African Examiner
Friday, December 23, 2011
next year– Iweala
African Examiner
Friday, December 23, 2011